OF50-3 best for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain

In January, 2012 I purchased the lower back pain Q magnet set, hoping it would help my SIJ pain. I had suffered chronic SIJ pain for 2 ½ years and had been through an SIJ spinal fusion and had numerous cortisone injections with little effect.

My spine specialist said the MRI confirmed the pain was referred from my right SIJ and that hopefully in a few years it would resolve, but in the mean time I had little pain relief. Unfortunately the QF28-6 magnets were not providing any relief even though I persisted for four weeks and visited a local physiotherapist to assist with the correct placement.

I discussed this with James at Neuromagnetics Australia and he suggested it might be worth trialling the OF50-3 which being 5cm round was large enough to capture the SIJ joint. As soon as I put it on, I could feel the difference and was able to move more freely.
When I take the magnet off for awhile, I get a real painful aching in the SIJ area. When I put it back on, my skin tingles at first, then it seems to dull the aching. It doesn’t completely take away the pain but it stops aching in the area, which helps me.
Hopefully my chronic pain will correct itself over time, but for now I am thankful that I can manage my pain to at least make it bearable with a simple therapy with no side effects.

Continue reading

Posted in SIJ Pain | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Positioning Neuromagnetics in the “window of effectiveness” for magnetic therapy.

Recent studies investigating the therapeutic effects of static magnetic fields propose there likely exists a “physiologic window” of effective magnetic field properties. This is certainly our experience and more research needs to be conducted to understand the parameters of this window for optimal therapeutic effect.

The fact is, there are 6 variables when it comes to the application of static magnet devices. If the offending target tissue (e.g. sensitized C-fibre nerves in spine) is enveloped by an optimized field by correctly applying the most appropriate device, then remarkable outcomes for pain sufferers are possible. Just like in the case of John with a 27 year history of chronic back pain.

After thousands of patients treated and numerous clinical trials and animal studies, there is now enough evidence to recommend protocols for effective Q magnet placement.

Continue reading

Posted in Magnetic Therapy, Research | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The role of the sympathetic nervous system in chronic pain and Q magnet therapy application.

The Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) is the part of the Autonomic Nervous System which prepares the body for stressful or emergency situations and promotes the flight or fight response. An overloaded SNS can heighten anxiety which in turn amplifies pain perception, effects pain behaviour and depresses mood.

The SNS can play a major role in sustaining chronic pain. Particularly in the case of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CPRS), formerly known as Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD), where you also see symptoms such as burning pain and physical changes in skin colour, texture and hair and nail growth.

The nerves of the SNS originate from the thoracolumbar region of the spinal cord, to be precise from T1 to L2. That is, the thoracic spine (mid back where the ribs attach to the spine) and the lumbar spine (lower back), see image below.

Continue reading

Posted in Magnetic Therapy, Training | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Inhomogeneous static magnetic field (magnetic therapy) effects on TMJ Pain

A recent paper studying the effects of an inhomogeneous magnetic field on dental pain was published in the International Journal of Radiation Biology. While the size of the study was relatively small (29 for TMJ pain) and of short duration (5 min), none the less, it demonstrated a significant pain relieving effect over placebo.

This was a double blind randomised controlled trial that looked at three types of dental pain – temperomandibular joint (TMJ), mouth ulcer (aphtha) and inflammation of the tooth socket (alveolitis).

The TMJ pain cohort had 16 in the active magnet group and 13 in the placebo. Pain measures using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were taken immediately before and after the application of the magnetic devices and 5 minutes later immediately before and after removal with averages taken for pre and post intervention.

Continue reading

Posted in Magnetic Therapy, News, Research | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sports Physiotherapist to the Australian Wallabies and Brisbane Lions shares his experience with Q magnets…

“I have been using Q magnets from Neuromagnetics Australia since 2004 both in private practice and in my capacity as team physiotherapist for the Wallaby’s and the Brisbane Lions.

In that time I have used them for a range of soft tissue injuries and I have particularly found them useful for reducing spasm, swelling and pain modulation.

While there is mixed evidence supporting the use of magnetic therapy, research on devices such as Q magnets do show promise which is encouraging. Anecdotally we have been happy with the clinical results achieved.

Continue reading

Posted in AFL, Physiotherapist, Rugby, Sport | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Neuromagnetics as a subset of the broad category magnetic therapy

When you understand the history of magnetic therapy, it’s easy to understand why and how it’s surrounded in mystery and scepticism. However, this does not negate the fact that promising subsets within magnetic therapy such as Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) and gradient modulated magnetic fields like those produced by Q magnets provide significant therapeutic benefits. After all, isn’t a large magnet at the leading edge of medical diagnostics? The MRI illustrates the possibilities.

11 out of the 13 randomised controlled trials relevant to multipolar magnets listed on our website, show positive effects over placebo. Some of the studies such as Vallbona, Costantino, Man and Laszlo showed significant pain relieving and fracture healing effects.

The two studies that showed no effect were Collacott and Cepeda.
Investigating low back pain was Collacott, who used a weak flexible rubber magnet with an effective penetration of around 10mm. This study was unlikely to show a positive effect because it was the wrong type of magnet. It requires a magnet such as the QF28-6 or OF50-3 to penetrate the 30-40mm required to capture the nerve roots and dorsal horn of the spine to be effective for low back pain.

Continue reading

Posted in Magnetic Therapy, Research | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Talented physiotherapist shares her Q magnets clinical experience.

As a physiotherapist for over 10 years I treat a range of conditions in private practice.

Since 2008 I have been using Q magnets as an adjunct in therapy and have seen some remarkable outcomes with patients.

OF50-3 Octapolar magnet; 50mm x 3mm

OF50-3 Octapolar magnet; 50mm x 3mm

 

Continue reading

Posted in Physiotherapist | 2 Comments

Faster recovery for soft tissue injury – Grade III calf tear…

 

Nicole presented on 13th April 2012, one day after a Grade III medial head gastroc tear while playing squash. Treatment consisted of Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation, laser therapy, a heel raise and non weight bearing crutches.

The following day (14th April), I applied two QF20-5 Q magnets with sports tape, one directly over the tear and another over the acupuncture point UB57.

Two days later on 16th April, we took the following photos showing a clear effect directly under where the magnets were placed.

Continue reading

Posted in Bruises, Sport | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Why is there so much confusion around magnetic therapy?

 

If you ever wanted an example of why there is so much confusion around magnetic therapy, then look no further than this ABC News story.

The article is discussing new research from the University of Virginia under the title “Can magnets cure pain?”. Problem is, the study has nothing to do with pain, it’s all about studying the effects of static magnetic fields on blood flow.

In fact, the hypothesis the researchers were testing (and consequently confirmed) as stated in the published study was “that acute application of static magnetic field to an inflammatory injury may limit the formation of edema and therefore accelerate healing.” Continue reading

Posted in Magnetic Therapy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Debunking myths around magnetic therapy and blood flow.

The idea that magnets increase blood flow has been repeated so often it reinforces the mantra, if you repeat something often enough people will start to believe it => established dogma!

From our perspective, the evidence for the therapeutic effect of quadrapolar and other multipolar magnets stems from their unique inhomogeneous magnetic field’s effect on the nervous system and in particular on unmyelinated C-fibres and not increasing blood flow. See how Q magnets work for more information.

We have always been dubious about claims of increased blood flow and have to work hard at not repeating it ourselves. So what is the evidence?

Continue reading

Posted in Magnetic Therapy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment